Old post with full review is located here.

I decided to recheck, perpahs i will be lucky…

And I am!

The old post could be found here, where all the old statistics and full review is located.

The New Result:

Final stable: 5403 3dMarks

The proving screens:

And the 3dMark06:

Some math:

3dmark, default: 4025

3dmark, clocked: 5403

Increase: +34%

What do you think now?

The memory clock was increased 58%.

The core clock was increased 59%

The shader clock was increased 59%

Hm, guite good, what do you think, on notebook, with no overclcoked cpu and memory? The temperature was not also so critical, maximum that i deteced was 81 degrees Celsius. The temperature in room around 19 degrees Celsius.

Unfortunately, the Futuremark ORB online result system is so mysteriously working,that no earlyer results were found for GeForce 8600M GT videocard. It will be very interesting to know the maximim results and frequencies…

Now the result satisfies me!

Truly, I am big overclocker enthusiast. Was, at least. First overclock experience was on Celeron 466 Mhz.

Afterward more, but this is not about my past.

Recently i received a new notebook from work. Brand new Dell XPS M1530. After reinstalling the VIsta for few times (some driver problems, that wifi problem, thought the driver was old, nope. Until i did not hang the wifi router, i was not satisfied. After I have realized, that the router was not so nicely set up. But ok, now everything is good).

The Notebook was up and running. Needed to make some tests. Played few evenings in Bioshock, Half- Life2, and so on. Have become bored. What else could be done with ‘the new toy’? Of course- overclock!

So here is the configuration

DELL XPS M1530

What`s inside:

And some screenshots from CPUID:

The OS is not optimized for clocking at all (yeah, with Vista and its Aero). Running from the AC- adapter, so the notebook does not clock down the video card, even accidentally. Later i will tell some strange thing about the video card.

Of course, this review is not so big as it could be, but here is overclocking potential tested.

The standard benchmark i used: 3dMark 2006. Screen is with all default values.

I decided to clock the memory first.

For that purpose I used Riva Tuner. Screen from my desktop.

Notice the difference between what is showed on Hardware Monitor and System tweak. The Core speed differes around 10 and 20 Mhz.

Started from 25 Mhz step, but it took too much time, so in the end i was taking bigger steps like 50 Mhz.

At 975 Mhz the memory was stable and took a benchmark.

Interesting thing, when memory was clocked to frequency, it could not operate normally. The frequency of whatever( core, memory) went down, to the ‘low power 3d’. And when you tried` v to start the benchmark, the frequency went down again! And it was impossible to change something, moving the frequency in Riva Tuner- video card did not react at all. Only restart helped always.

Don`t know why so, perhaps not to damage the card. Sometimes, when first tests were running nicely, at full speed, at the end the card lowered its frequency. Because of that 3dMark score sometimes was around 3,5k. Maybe now the main priority is image quality, not speed(meaning no horizontal lines anymore, when memory speed is too high?).Interesting…

Screen, showing the memory speed.

3dMark score with the memory on 975 Mhz.

With the memory on 975 Mhz,3dMark06 benchmark showed us 4272 (3dMarks?Parrots?).

+200 in 3dMark06, not so much at all. +275 Mhz.

Now we clear with memory, let us make some tests with core and shader clock.

I did not change the core/ shader speed ratio.

Again some interesting stuff. When the speed was adjusted to bigger value, than 621 Mhz (570 Mhz showed Riva Tuner), the speed did not increase. Same situation was with memory, maximum 1000 Mhz, but it was awfully unstable and the frequency was always dropped automatically. Some hardware protection?

When i was clocking the first time core and shader speed, it was made in one session. So the 1241/621 Mhz was unstable. It was already a bed time, so i went to sleep.

Next day, first attempt - 1241/621 Mhz. Passed! 4538 3dMarks!

Final Test

The memory was stress tested, core also. What do we need?

Complex benchmark. Now I run the whole video card clocked. Will see what happenes.

Here is some additional data:

Final set-up

Final Score

Result - 4648 3dMarks.

Good or bad? Lets use some math…

Memory:

Default: 600 Mhz

Clocked: 950 Mhz

Speed: + 58%

3dmark default: 4025

3dmark clocked memory: 4272

Increase: + 6,1%

Core/shader:

Default: 475/ 975 Mhz

Clocked: 580/ 1161 Mhz

Speed: + 22,1%/ +19%

3dmark default: 4025

3dmark clocked memory: 4538

Increase: + 12,7%

Full overclock:

3dmark default: 4025

3dmark clocked memory: 4648

Increase: + 15,5%

Conclusion

What to we have in the end? Increased efficiency by 15%? Not to much. I am concerned, that it is possible to squeeze out some more 200 points in 3dMark06, but is not it worth of it. We should not forget this is notebook, we are carrying it with us, and the battery has reasons to recharge extra fast with overclocked video.

My opinion- the overclock is not worth of it!

P.S. In time, perhaps, i will make some test, but only the PhysX stuff activated on this video card, i heard this is possible…