5 topics to help you reorganize financial life and personal investments.
September 8, 2008
Desire to keep your expenses low, very often will not make you ‘own’ more money.
One of the biggest delusion when reorganizing financial life is thinking about ’spending less money’. Of course, all unnecessary purchasing should be canceled, but not important ones. Spending money on necessary, or what will definitely pay for itself is ‘life important’. For example you wanted to save some money- you did not go to service when strange noise started to come under the hood of your car. Few weeks or even days later it can become so awful, that the whole engine should be repaired and that will be expensive.
Here are 5 advices to keep your money up and running:
- Do not buy anything on sales.
Cheap stuff rarely offers good quality. On the sales often you do not think about so simple things, like ‘do I really need that stuff?’. If you have really found something you think is very needed, do not buy it, until you have checked all other possibilities (perhaps the same price but higher quality?). Buy only when there is really no other possibility. - Do not buy cheap things.
‘Cheap’ does not mean ‘good’. To receive in full, think not about the price, but about the value. Cheap car will be more expensive in running or service. This type of car has lover value than more expensive car, which running costs are lower. This type of ‘used to’ can be used anywhere, what means - you are buying things that are a little bit expensive, but will fully pay for itself. - Do not loose your time.
Sitting at home in front of the TV. Of course, it is much ‘cheaper’ to sit at home than going out, for example, to pub. Instead of being home and complaining that you can not afford yourself some entertainment, you could attend professional developing courses. So you could find better job or improve personal financial skills. The next year you wont complain anymore. - Do not spend to much time on analyzing the stock.
In the beginning, it would be better to put your capital into fund. You would not worry so much about the money, and it will be growing (should be at least). With this you have the ‘money - making - more - money’ stuff and do not need to spend time on analyzes (you should be working that time). In time, when you are more financially independent and with a little more resources on bank account- go on, enter the big world of investment! - Do not trust all investments to experts.
‘Never have all the eggs in one basket’- this is the best description. You have your own head on the shoulders, and it should be thinking. You should use experts skills and knowledge, but the last decision is your one. The job salary can not be the main motivation in job seeking. The biggest mistake to choose a job what pays good, but you do not like it (I think even hate sometimes). In long- term investment you should be doing the thing you like. Even if it is not paying back at first, it will definitely later do. Man gives much more of himself for what he likes to do. Psychology.
GeForce 8600M GT overclock. Higher frequencies, double overclock result
September 7, 2008
Recently i have written a small overview of a GeForce 8600M GT, and its overclocking capabilities. I was not satisfied by the results at all. I watch other forums, blogs, read overviews and noticed- this vide card should be capable to run 650 Mhz core. My result was only 580 Mhz and 4648 3dMarks. Not good at all.
Old post with full review is located here.
I decided to recheck, perpahs i will be lucky…
And I am!
The old post could be found here, where all the old statistics and full review is located.
The New Result:
|
Memory: |
950 MHz |
|
Core Clock: |
756 MHz |
|
Shader clock: |
1512 Mhz |
Final stable: 5403 3dMarks
The proving screens:
And the 3dMark06:
Some math:
3dmark, default: 4025
3dmark, clocked: 5403
Increase: +34%
What do you think now?
The memory clock was increased 58%.
The core clock was increased 59%
The shader clock was increased 59%
Hm, guite good, what do you think, on notebook, with no overclcoked cpu and memory? The temperature was not also so critical, maximum that i deteced was 81 degrees Celsius. The temperature in room around 19 degrees Celsius.
Unfortunately, the Futuremark ORB online result system is so mysteriously working,that no earlyer results were found for GeForce 8600M GT videocard. It will be very interesting to know the maximim results and frequencies…
Now the result satisfies me!
GeForce 8600M GT overclock
September 3, 2008
New updated result with higher result is posted here.
Truly, I am big overclocker enthusiast. Was, at least. First overclock experience was on Celeron 466 Mhz.
Afterward more, but this is not about my past.
Recently i received a new notebook from work. Brand new Dell XPS M1530. After reinstalling the VIsta for few times (some driver problems, that wifi problem, thought the driver was old, nope. Until i did not hang the wifi router, i was not satisfied. After I have realized, that the router was not so nicely set up. But ok, now everything is good).
The Notebook was up and running. Needed to make some tests. Played few evenings in Bioshock, Half- Life2, and so on. Have become bored. What else could be done with ‘the new toy’? Of course- overclock!
So here is the configuration
DELL XPS M1530
What`s inside:
|
CPU |
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 2.1GHz |
|
Memory |
2048MB DDR2 667MHz |
|
HDD |
160GB 5400RPM |
|
Video |
nVIDIA GeForce Go 8600M GT 256MB |
|
Display |
15.4” 1680×1050 WSXGA+ |
|
OS |
Windows Vista Business SP1 |
And some screenshots from CPUID:
The OS is not optimized for clocking at all (yeah, with Vista and its Aero). Running from the AC- adapter, so the notebook does not clock down the video card, even accidentally. Later i will tell some strange thing about the video card.
Of course, this review is not so big as it could be, but here is overclocking potential tested.
The standard benchmark i used: 3dMark 2006. Screen is with all default values.
I decided to clock the memory first.
For that purpose I used Riva Tuner. Screen from my desktop.
Notice the difference between what is showed on Hardware Monitor and System tweak. The Core speed differes around 10 and 20 Mhz.
Started from 25 Mhz step, but it took too much time, so in the end i was taking bigger steps like 50 Mhz.
|
Memory |
750 MHz |
Stable |
|
|
775 MHz |
Stable |
|
|
800 MHz |
Stable |
|
|
850 MHz |
Stable |
|
|
900 MHz |
Stable |
|
|
950 MHz |
Stable |
|
|
1000 MHz |
Non Stable |
|
|
975 MHz |
Stable |
At 975 Mhz the memory was stable and took a benchmark.
Interesting thing, when memory was clocked to frequency, it could not operate normally. The frequency of whatever( core, memory) went down, to the ‘low power 3d’. And when you tried` v to start the benchmark, the frequency went down again! And it was impossible to change something, moving the frequency in Riva Tuner- video card did not react at all. Only restart helped always.
Don`t know why so, perhaps not to damage the card. Sometimes, when first tests were running nicely, at full speed, at the end the card lowered its frequency. Because of that 3dMark score sometimes was around 3,5k. Maybe now the main priority is image quality, not speed(meaning no horizontal lines anymore, when memory speed is too high?).Interesting…
Screen, showing the memory speed.
3dMark score with the memory on 975 Mhz.
With the memory on 975 Mhz,3dMark06 benchmark showed us 4272 (3dMarks?Parrots?).
+200 in 3dMark06, not so much at all. +275 Mhz.
Now we clear with memory, let us make some tests with core and shader clock.
I did not change the core/ shader speed ratio.
|
Shader |
Core |
Stability |
|
1080 MHz |
540 MHz |
Stable |
|
1116 MHz |
558 MHz |
Stable |
|
1188 MHz |
594 MHz |
Stable |
|
1242 MHz |
621 MHz |
Failed, another attempt. Works, 4583 3dMarks |
Again some interesting stuff. When the speed was adjusted to bigger value, than 621 Mhz (570 Mhz showed Riva Tuner), the speed did not increase. Same situation was with memory, maximum 1000 Mhz, but it was awfully unstable and the frequency was always dropped automatically. Some hardware protection?
When i was clocking the first time core and shader speed, it was made in one session. So the 1241/621 Mhz was unstable. It was already a bed time, so i went to sleep.
Next day, first attempt - 1241/621 Mhz. Passed! 4538 3dMarks!
Final Test
The memory was stress tested, core also. What do we need?
Complex benchmark. Now I run the whole video card clocked. Will see what happenes.
Here is some additional data:
|
Memory: |
950 MHz |
|
Core Clock: |
580 MHz |
|
Shader clock: |
1161 Mhz |
70 degrees Celsius.
Final set-up
Final Score
Result - 4648 3dMarks.
Good or bad? Lets use some math…
Memory:
Default: 600 Mhz
Clocked: 950 Mhz
Speed: + 58%
3dmark default: 4025
3dmark clocked memory: 4272
Increase: + 6,1%
Core/shader:
Default: 475/ 975 Mhz
Clocked: 580/ 1161 Mhz
Speed: + 22,1%/ +19%
3dmark default: 4025
3dmark clocked memory: 4538
Increase: + 12,7%
Full overclock:
3dmark default: 4025
3dmark clocked memory: 4648
Increase: + 15,5%
Conclusion
What to we have in the end? Increased efficiency by 15%? Not to much. I am concerned, that it is possible to squeeze out some more 200 points in 3dMark06, but is not it worth of it. We should not forget this is notebook, we are carrying it with us, and the battery has reasons to recharge extra fast with overclocked video.
My opinion- the overclock is not worth of it!
P.S. In time, perhaps, i will make some test, but only the PhysX stuff activated on this video card, i heard this is possible…
The most complete Valve Corporation history
August 27, 2008
Valve Corporation


































